Cookie-inställningar

Vi använder cookies för att ge dig en bättre användarupplevelse och personlig service. Genom att samtycka till användningen av cookies kan vi utveckla en ännu bättre tjänst och tillhandahålla innehåll som är intressant för dig. Du har kontroll över dina cookiepreferenser och kan ändra dem när som helst. Läs mer om våra cookies.

Dessa cookies hjälper oss att mäta och optimera vår marknadsföring.

Cookies för inställningar låter en webbplats komma ihåg information som ändrar hur webbplatsen fungerar eller visas. Detta kan t.ex. vara föredraget språk eller regionen du befinner dig i.

För att förbättra vår hemsida samlar vi anonym information som är till för statistikföring och analyser. Med hjälp av dessa cookies kan vi t.ex föja med hur många besökare sidan har eller hur länge de stannat på sidan. Detta hjälper oss att skapa en bättre användarupplevelse.

Dessa cookies är nödvändiga för att sidan skall fungera korrekt.
Redigera cookies

No welfare without healthy common sense

That famous Finnish common sense is needed now, if ever. Why? Because the county elec­tions concern the natio­nal economy, health, and safety - such vital matters that this ever-lasting healt­h­care and social welfare mess is somet­hing to be asha­med about. No party deser­ves style points for this. We don’t either. 

The Govern­ment has deci­ded to “solve” the problem by buil­ding a new, regi­o­nal layer of admi­nist­ra­tion. Whet­her it will incre­ase care and secu­rity, that is still unknown. The only thing that seems thre­a­te­ningly obvious is that bureaucracy and costs will get out of hand. In other words, services will not be closer, queues will not be shor­ter, and the elderly will not be getting more of the care they need.

Every right-minded Finn understands that no one will be cured, and fire safety will not be strengthened by incre­a­sing bureaucracy and forms. 

There­fore, common sense is needed. Common sense has been a Finnish resource throug­hout time, and it works at all times. It does not have a geograp­hi­cal address or postal code. It provi­des a glimpse of understan­ding where gibbe­rish has taken power. At its best, it exceeds regi­o­nal borders at the speed of light. It loves solu­tions and hates vanity and pompo­sity. 

If you beli­eve in Finnish common sense, vote for the Natio­nal Coali­tion Party. We want care and secu­rity to be incre­a­sed and unne­ces­sary admi­nist­ra­tion to be redu­ced, regard­less of the number of layers. For us, the most impor­tant aspect is that, instead of the machi­nery, people, custo­mers, and profes­sio­nals retain their working capa­city and are well.  

There­fore, the heart is on the right - in the county elec­tions too. 

THE OBJECTIVE OF THE NATIONAL COALITION PARTY is to make Finland a place where people are well. We want people to have easy access to care and that the limi­ted resour­ces are suffi­ci­ent for the service needs of the ageing popu­la­tion. To achi­eve the objective, the social welfare, healt­h­care, and rescue services must seam­lessly work toget­her. 

FOR US, IT IS IMPORTANT that users of healt­h­care and social welfare services have an oppor­tu­nity to influ­ence their services. It is impor­tant for the Natio­nal Coali­tion Party that people have access to services when they need them. It is not signi­fi­cant whet­her the services are produ­ced by a welfare area, a company or entre­pre­neur, or a healt­h­care and social welfare services orga­ni­sa­tion. 

FUNCTIONAL SERVICES are the result of colla­bo­ra­tion between skil­led and healthy person­nel. There­fore, welfare areas must place effort in occu­pa­tio­nal well-being. For example, good leaders­hip and new opera­ting methods can improve both employees’ well-being and the quality of services. 

A VOTE FOR THE NATIONAL COALITION PARTY is a vote for sustai­nable econo­mic mana­ge­ment in these elec­tions too. We do not want the poorly mana­ged economy of welfare areas to cause Finnish services to suffer, the tax burden to grow, or the Govern­men­t’s indeb­ted­ness to acce­le­rate. The Natio­nal Coali­tion Party says no to provin­cial tax because it would unavo­i­dably lead to higher taxa­tion on Finnish work.

WITHOUT SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY, we would not have the newest incu­ba­tors for prema­ture babies, the world’s leading cancer treat­ment or free dental care for all child­ren and adole­scents. When the economy is in order, and people have work, there is also enough money for services that are impor­tant to all of us. 

1. Vote for shor­ter queues, not for heavier admi­nist­ra­tion models.

In our opinion, the most impor­tant objective for refor­ming the healt­h­care and social welfare services is to get people from queues to care more quickly. 

Every Finn should be able to rely on the fact that neces­sary help, care, and treat­ment is avai­lable in both natio­nal langu­a­ges when they are needed. The Natio­nal Coali­tion Party wishes to particu­larly empha­sise preven­ta­tive services because the sooner problems are sorted, more humane and econo­mic expen­ses are suffi­ci­ent. In addi­tion to preven­tion, an impor­tant part of the entity is reha­bi­li­ta­tion and health promo­tion at one’s own initi­a­tive, such as adequate exer­cise. It must be easy and effort­less to access services.

The Natio­nal Coali­tion Party would reform services for the 21st century by furt­her utili­sing current know­ledge, tech­no­logy, and arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence. Infor­ma­tion must easily move within and between systems. We must learn from previous, often poorly success­ful, infor­ma­tion system projects.  

Digi­tal and mobile services are a way of signi­fi­cantly impro­ving access to care. For example, remote doctor and nurse recep­tions can faci­li­tate pati­ents’ everyday lives, reduce costs, and incre­ase equa­lity among people. Particu­lar atten­tion should be paid to infor­ma­tion secu­rity when deve­lo­ping welfare areas’ infor­ma­tion systems.

Procee­ding with these methods:

  1. Improve avai­la­bi­lity of services and faci­li­tate access to care by, for example, intro­du­cing remote recep­tions of healt­h­care and social welfare service centres in all welfare areas.
  2. Improve access to mental health services nationwide by imple­men­ting a statu­tory therapy guaran­tee. 
  3. Ensure suffi­ci­ent support services for fami­lies with child­ren to faci­li­tate their everyday lives and prevent the need for more intense child protec­tion services.
  4. Place an effort on the quality of home care, shel­te­red housing and 24h care. Effecti­vely inter­vene in viola­tions and other faults in services.
  5. Conti­nue to main­tain pupil welfare services’ psycho­lo­gist and cura­tor services close in the everyday life of child­ren and adole­scents. Also recog­nise students as a custo­mer group of welfare areas.
  6. Improve the posi­tion of care­gi­vers and support their coping. Offer suffi­ci­ent support and services to those living at home, for example, with service vouchers.
  7. From the very begin­ning, services must be deve­lo­ped to be acces­sible and understan­dable as well as, for example, acces­sible to vision and hearing-impai­red people and by consi­de­ring the unique needs of elderly people.
  8. Ensure that help is avai­lable at a low thres­hold to people with addic­tions, such as people suffe­ring from substance abuse and gambling problems.

2. Vote for a person, not a form.

We want users of healt­h­care and social welfare services to have even more oppor­tu­ni­ties in the future to influ­ence the services through free­dom of choice. 

If neces­sary, it must be possible to choose a diffe­rent service provi­der if the services do not work for one reason or anot­her. People’s possi­bi­lity to choose their own service provi­der will encou­rage welfare areas to orga­nise services in a high quality and acces­sible manner. New inno­va­tions of better-opera­ting methods are formed when there is pressure to deve­lop them. The conti­nu­ous deve­lop­ment of services is, above all, an advan­tage for service users.

The Natio­nal Coali­tion Party trusts that the best result is achi­e­ved with seam­less colla­bo­ra­tion between the welfare area, compa­nies, and orga­ni­sa­tions. The entity produ­cing the services is not signi­fi­cant. For the Natio­nal Coali­tion Party, the most impor­tant thing is that services are avai­lable whene­ver they are needed. 

This is how it is achi­e­ved:

  1. Promote people’s genu­ine oppor­tu­nity to choose in healt­h­care and social welfare services. At the same time, the oppor­tu­ni­ties to safe­gu­ard local services will strengthen.
  2. Give people the oppor­tu­nity to influ­ence their services by, for example, exten­ding the use of service vouchers and deve­lo­ping the Kela compen­sa­tion of private medi­cal care. The Natio­nal Coali­tion Party disap­pro­ves of the reduc­tion of Kela compen­sa­tion.
  3. For example, in the services for disabled and elderly people, utilise a so-called perso­nal budget, which the custo­mer can use within agreed boundary condi­tions for acqui­ring services that promote func­tio­nal capa­city and faci­li­tate everyday life. 
  4. Moni­tor the quality of services regard­less of the provi­der. Effecti­vely inter­vene in obser­ved faults.

3. Vote for action, not bureaucracy

Few Finns are regu­lar custo­mers of rescue services, but every­one appre­ci­a­tes that emer­gency medi­cal and rescue services are quickly and profes­sio­nally avai­lable when they are needed. Profes­sio­nals of the rescue services are often the first to encoun­ter people who need urgent assistance. 

It is impor­tant to us that, when deve­lo­ping welfare areas, the posi­tion of rescue services is strong, and they are not side-lined by healt­h­care and social welfare services when deve­lo­ping welfare areas. Rescue services must be conti­nued to be produ­ced in a high quality and consi­stent manner throug­hout Finland. The opera­tio­nal readi­ness of rescue services and assistance must be ensu­red both in cities and rural areas. 

We promise to ensure that the resour­ces of rescue services will conti­nue to remain suffi­ci­ent. It is crucial to the Natio­nal Coali­tion Party that rescue services do not become a sepa­rate func­tion within the orga­ni­sa­tion of a welfare area. The colla­bo­ra­tion of rescue and emer­gency medi­cal services must be utili­sed to its full capa­city. 

What if we did as follows:

  1. With suffi­ci­ent funding, trai­ning, and person­nel resour­ces, ensure that rescue and emer­gency medi­cal services are avai­lable throug­hout Finland quickly and consi­stently. 
  2. Produce rescue services in a high quality and cost-effective manner while ensu­ring the skills and safety of profes­sio­nals.
  3. Deepen the colla­bo­ra­tion of healt­h­care and social welfare services and rescue services so that the services operate seam­lessly for the custo­mer. 
  4. Safe­gu­ard the funding and opera­ting requi­re­ments of contract fire depart­ments in the welfare areas to be established. 
  5. Ensure the welfare areas’ possi­bi­lity to anti­ci­pate and prepare for distur­ban­ces and excep­tio­nal condi­tions toget­her with other autho­ri­ties.

4. In favour of a sustai­nable economy, against waste­ful spen­ding.

The Natio­nal Coali­tion Party wants services to be produ­ced in a high-quality manner while also being cost-effective so that there are enough for every­one in need. 

Taxes cannot be incre­a­sed inde­fi­ni­tely. There­fore, deci­sion-making requires deci­sion-makers who can reform opera­ting methods in order to make a limi­ted amount of money achi­eve more and better. 

Healthy compe­ti­tion between service provi­ders is a method for impro­ving quality and cost-effi­ci­ency in healt­h­care and social welfare services. There­fore, the establish­ment of fair compe­ti­tion and func­tio­nal markets must be promo­ted in welfare areas. Procu­re­ments must be imple­men­ted so that smal­ler compa­nies also have the oppor­tu­nity to parti­ci­pate in tenders. At the same time, it must be ensu­red that suffi­ci­ent procu­re­ment skills are avai­lable in the areas.

We do not want Finnish taxa­tion to incre­ase due to the poor econo­mic mana­ge­ment of welfare areas. We say no to provin­cial tax because it would unavo­i­dably lead to higher work taxa­tion.

We propose the following:

  1. Ensure sustai­nable econo­mic mana­ge­ment in welfare areas, too, so that the Govern­men­t’s indeb­ted­ness can be redu­ced and tax incre­a­ses can be avoi­ded.
  2. Utilise compa­nies and orga­ni­sa­tions in the services of a welfare area to improve quality and cost-effi­ci­ency in actual healt­h­care and social welfare services and support opera­tions, such as faci­lity, meal and clea­ning services. 
  3. Deve­lop welfare areas in such a way that resour­ces are targe­ted even better to services rather than admi­nist­ra­tion.
  4. Require full trans­pa­rency and open­ness of expen­ses in all welfare areas. In this way, the best and most result­ful opera­ting models can be quickly intro­du­ced.
  5. Give up the prepa­ra­tions of a provin­cial tax because, accor­ding to experts, its intro­duc­tion would likely lead to an incre­ase in work taxa­tion.

5. Who will be healthy if the person­nel are not healthy?

We want social welfare, health, and rescue service profes­sio­nals to cope and enjoy their work. The requi­re­ment for services produ­ced in a high-quality manner is healthy person­nel, which is suffi­ci­ent to carry out the requi­red duties. An impor­tant part of success­ful services is genu­ine and caring encoun­ters between service users and profes­sio­nals. 

The most impor­tant prerequi­si­tes of occu­pa­tio­nal well-being are good leaders­hip and precise opera­ting models, which person­nel also have the possi­bi­lity to influ­ence. Leaders­hip must be based on current know­ledge and sector exper­tise. Healthy and moti­va­ted person­nel will carry out their duties better, and this will also be visible in the services’ quality and results. 

For occu­pa­tio­nal well-being and the preven­tion of unne­ces­sary stress, it is impor­tant that every worker can focus as much as possible on work duties that corre­spond to their skills. It is also essen­tial that super­vi­sors and colle­a­gues provide support to succeed in work duties.

Would it work in this way:

  1. Focus on good leaders­hip, the deve­lop­ment of opera­ting methods, and the payroll syste­m’s encou­ra­ge­ment to improve person­nel’s occu­pa­tio­nal well-being and work comfort. Person­nel must be awar­ded for good perfor­mance to deve­lop both them­sel­ves and the work envi­ron­ment.
  2. Ensure that the welfare area’s employees can focus on work duties that corre­spond to their skills. If neces­sary, review personnel’s work distri­bu­tion.
  3. Particu­larly strengthen the attracti­ve­ness of the healt­h­care and social welfare sector by, for example, deve­lo­ping trai­ning and career paths and incre­a­sing the amount of healt­h­care sector trai­ning. 
  4. Offer person­nel oppor­tu­ni­ties for suffi­ci­ent follow-up and supple­men­tary trai­ning. 
  5. Also, recruit quali­fied healt­h­care and social welfare workers from abroad. Ensure that they have suffi­ci­ent lingu­istic profi­ci­ency and Finnish work practice skills. Ensure that the most suitable indi­vi­du­als are always selec­ted for the healt­h­care, social welfare, and rescue service sector.

Common sense has been a Finnish resource throug­hout time, and it works at all times. It does not have a geograp­hi­cal address or postal code. At its best, it exceeds regi­o­nal borders at the speed of light. It loves solu­tions and hates vanity and pompo­sity. It does not beli­eve that a new layer of admi­nist­ra­tion or any other walls will cure anyone. It knows that queues will not shor­ten with forms. 

Matters tend to be solved with common sense; many subjects of fuss will not be fussed over. Func­tio­nal care and secu­rity require more understan­ding and heart than poli­ti­cal bureaucracy.

Printa Dela på Facebook Twittra

Mer innehåll i samma kategori

Skip to content